Astrophotography diagnosis of jupiter: Bad seeing

Processed

The Doc examined this image of jupiter (processed). Estimated overall technical quality: 7/10. 1 defect found: Bad seeing (severity 2/5).

Annotated image
Click to zoom

Info

Cible
jupiter
Position
4h00m00s · +15°00'00"

The 93 % waxing gibbous Moon has no impact here: in planetary imaging the target is far brighter than the sky background, and both lunar and urban light pollution are non-issues. The only sky parameter that matters is turbulence, and that is exactly what limits this image. The slightly softened limb and the blurred festoons in the north equatorial belt point to average rather than good seeing. If you can pick your nights, favour evenings with a weak jet stream (Meteoblue seeing charts or Windy at the 250 hPa level) over merely clear ones: in planetary work, a transparent but turbulent night delivers less than a hazy but stable one.

- the Doc

Setup

Type d'image
Traitée
Phase de lune
Gibbeuse croissante (93 %)
FOV
0.6'

The 0.01 degree field confirms a long focal length configuration consistent with a C8 plus Barlow: Jupiter fills roughly two thirds of the frame height, a good compromise between resolution scale and recentring margin for drift. The C8 is a well suited instrument for Jupiter, capable of reaching sub arcsecond detail on a good night. The image scale looks appropriate: this is not the soft oversampled case where the disc is huge and empty of detail. Just make sure the tube is fully cooled before each session, a closed C8 easily needs an hour to stabilise, and tube currents mimic exactly the seeing you are suffering from here.

- the Doc

The diagnosis in detail

The image is technically sound. The disc is well exposed with no highlight clipping: the equatorial zone keeps its cream shading and the limb retains a progressive falloff, which means you did not push the histogram too far at capture. The colour rendition is restrained, with ochre belts and bluish zones consistent with Jupiter's natural look, free of the magenta or greenish drift common on over-aggressive planetary processing.

The only limiting point is sharpness. The structures present (equatorial belts, Great Red Spot, white ovals in the south temperate zone) are identifiable, but their edges are smoothed and the detail level a C8 can deliver is missing: crisp festoons in the NEB, filaments within the belts, internal structure in the Red Spot. This shortfall comes from turbulence rather than an optical or focus fault, since overall belt contrast remains good and the limb is neither doubled nor distorted.

Processing has not been overdriven, and that is the right call: pushing wavelets on a seeing limited image only reveals noise. Progress will come upstream, at capture time.

Priority actions

  1. Capture Jupiter within the hour around meridian transit, when it is highest
  2. Record longer SER files (several thousand frames) and keep only the best 10 to 25 % of frames
  3. Cool the C8 for at least 45 to 60 minutes before starting
  4. Target nights with a weak jet stream rather than merely clear nights
  5. Refine wavelets in multiple graded steps rather than a single slider, once the stacked raw is better