Astrophotography diagnosis of IC 1848: no defect detected

Raw300s17 sept. 2026

The Doc examined this image of IC 1848 (raw, 300s). Estimated overall technical quality: 8/10. No significant defect was found on this acquisition.

Annotated image
Click to zoom

Info

Cible
IC 1848
Date
17 sept. 2026, 00:46
Lune
Gibbeuse décroissante 67.4% (sous l'horizon)
Site
Bortle 2 · rural typique (VIIRS)
Position
2h48m46s · +60°19'24"

Excellent conditions. Bortle 2 is as good as it gets for IC 1848, and the Moon, waning gibbous at 67%, is below the horizon and 144 degrees from the target: no lunar contribution is possible on this sub. The measured background confirms it, with no significant oriented gradient (plane R2=0.18, plane/radial dominance 0.23). In this context you have no sky background constraint at all, which leaves full freedom to lengthen subs and pile up time. On an emission nebula like this one, narrowband under Bortle 2 is a luxury: the limiting factor will be total integration time alone, not light pollution.

- the Doc

Setup

Type d'image
Brut
Télescope
EQMod Mount
Caméra
ZWO ASI585MM Pro
Exposition
300s
Phase de lune
Premier croissant (28 %)
FOV
3.36°

Setup is well matched to the target. At 190 mm focal length, the 3.36 degree field frames IC 1848 entirely with margin on the edges, the right choice for this extended nebula. Sampling at 3.15 arcsec/px is undersampled (stars measure 1.3 to 1.8 px FWHM, so pixel-limited rather than seeing-limited): acceptable on an extended narrowband target, but you will not resolve fine detail. Gain 200 on the ASI585MM is high but consistent for Ha, offset 15 is sufficient (0% dark clipping), and -20C at the sensor is healthy. The 300s sub stays short given the measured background margin: 420 to 600s would be better if tracking holds.

- the Doc

The diagnosis in detail

Optically and mechanically this sub is clean. Moffat measurements give FWHM of 1.3 to 1.8 px across zones, with a corner/center ratio of 0.923: the corners are actually slightly tighter than the center, which rules out any field curvature or backfocus error. Elongation peaks at 1.16 in the center against a field floor of 1.07, and PA dispersion between zones reaches 26.6 degrees, the signature of round stars with no preferred direction: no tracking drift and no guiding oscillation over these 300s.

The automatic pre-verdict suggested tilt, but I reject it: its measured confidence is only 31%, and the PSF panel shows no diagonal asymmetry between opposite corners. TL and BR read 1.34 and 1.62 px, TR and BL 1.39 and 1.55 px, differences on the order of fit noise on a single sub. That is random modulation, not a tilted plane.

The only real issue is signal level. The background sits 1.69 units above the black point, far from the sky-limited regime. That is normal behavior for Ha under a Bortle 2 sky, but it means your final quality will depend entirely on accumulated total time. The visible nebulosity matches the DSS structure well, with no background artifact to report.

Priority actions

  1. Accumulate integration time: aim for 3 to 5 hours in Ha on IC 1848 to pull fine structure out of the noise
  2. Try a 420 to 600s sub to lift the background further above read noise, tracking clearly supports it
  3. Ignore the tilt pre-verdict: the PSF is healthy, do not touch backfocus or sensor orientation