Astrophotography diagnosis of M45: Tracking drift, backfocus error and 1 other
Processed
The Doc examined this image of M45 (processed). Estimated overall technical quality: 7/10. 3 defects found: Tracking drift (severity 2/5), Backfocus error (severity 2/5), Clipped stars (severity 2/5).
&w=1920&q=75)
Info
- Cible
- M45
Waxing crescent Moon at 7%, so negligible: no lunar pollution expected and background handling does not suffer. The measured background variation (+85%) corresponds to M45's own reflection nebulosity, not an instrumental gradient, as confirmed by the non-optical profile. Favorable conditions for this low-surface-brightness target; most of the limits come from setup and tracking, not the sky.
Setup
- Type d'image
- Traitée
- Phase de lune
- Waxing crescent (7 %)
A monochrome camera on a reflection target like M45 is coherent, especially for a luminance-then-color approach. The ~2 px central FWHM indicates correct sampling and seeing, neither over nor undersampled to a problematic degree. The background-to-black-point margin e_margin 2.12 stays low: the background is not clearly lifted, a sign of slightly short exposures or integration to cleanly bring out the faint wisps without noise. Consider increasing total cumulative time on the nebula.
The diagnosis in detail
The image is broadly successful: M45's reflection nebulosity is well rendered, with contrasted filaments and wisps, and a background coherent with real structure (confirmed as object by measurement, not a gradient). On the stellar side, the PSF panel shows tight FWHM (1.8 to 2.4 px) and well-fitted Moffat ellipses, so optics and focus are healthy.
Two minor signatures do measure, however. First, slight tracking drift: central elongation (1.16) exceeds the field floor with a highly coherent direction (PA dispersion of only 12°), which rules out simple native roundness and points to guiding. Second, a symmetric FWHM rise toward the four corners (ratio 1.254, center minimum), an oval profile typical of a small backfocus error or residual field curvature, right at the detection threshold.
Finally, the cores of the bright stars, including the central star, are clipped to white by the stretch. All of this remains refinement: the image is usable and pleasing, gains will come from slightly tighter guiding, fine backfocus tuning and better highlight preservation.
Priority actions
- Tighten guiding (check RMS, calibration, polar alignment) to remove the slight central drift
- Fine-tune backfocus in 0.5 mm steps until corner/center FWHM ratio < 1.15
- Protect bright-star cores (star mask / HDR) during the stretch
- Increase total integration time to better lift the background and reduce noise in the faint wisps
Similar diagnoses

M 16
Tracking drift

Fireworks
Tracking drift

M42 - The Great Orion Nebula 1st capture (2019)
Oversaturation
Related articles
Elongated Stars in Astrophotography: Causes and Solutions
How to Analyze an Astrophoto Light Frame Before Stacking
Astrophotography Problems: Solutions for Successful Images